At least for Mrs. Turner, interpreting her racism as caused by worshipping ivory idols seems appealing. Her rigid hierarchy of race fits with a model which places her in a middling position between gods (those whiter than her) and devils (those blacker than her). Her willingness to be snubbed and humiliated by Janie also fits with a similar religious desire to grovel before the gods and propitiate them with one's own suffering.
However, one way of interpreting the hurricane would be to see the lake-monster as a pagan god who provides the fertility of the muck, but also "dispenses suffering without reason." But where are the sacrifices to the muck-god? Where is the fear and trembling that Hurston insists accompanies "real gods" and is the "most divine emotion"? Do we see a "first fruits" ceremony where a portion of the beans is ritually thrown back to the muck to placate the muck-god and pray for continued fertility and no hurricanes this year? Instead, the muck-dwellers seem to simply commune with the blackness, and accept the hurricane as a fact of life, not a divine punishment. As is the case with other broad generalities put forth by the narrator in Their Eyes Were Watching God, the passage about gods and sacrifices is challenged by other events in the novel. Perhaps we should read such "truths" served up by the narrator as conditional and local--applicable only to the situation at hand and not all cases.
I think you're absolutely right that not even the narrator's statements can be taken at face value. That said, maybe what you rightly describe as the quasi-anthropological discourse in this passage needs to be differentiated from those asides that are more reflective of folk traditions (as are the references to the hurricane as a "monstropulous" beast)?
ReplyDelete